\documentstyle[11pt,RTA96]{article}
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
%                        Report form for RTA96                          %
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
\begin{document}
\begin{RefReport} % -----------------------------------------------------
\PaperNumber{60}
\Title{ Discrete Normalization and Standardization in
                        Deterministic Residual Structures}
\Authors{Z. Khasidashvili and J. Glauert         }
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
% Common part for authors and the PC.                                   %
% Replace the question marks below by ratings from 0 to 10,             %
% with 10 being the best.                                               %
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
\Accuracy{8}            % technical accuracy                            %
\Significance{8}        % significance of the work                      %
\Originality{7}         % originality of the work                       %
\Presentation{7}        % quality of presentation                       %
\Appropriateness{7}     % appropriateness for RTA                       %
\Overall{7}             % overall evaluation of the paper by the referee%
                        %   10 - 8  : strong accept                     %
                        %    7 - 6  : weak accept                       %
                        %    5 - 4  : weak reject                       %
                        %    3 - 1  : strong reject                     %
                        %        0  : outside the scope of RTA          %
\Confidence{?}          % referee's confidence in the paper's subject   %
\OverallPC{ }           % overall evaluation of the paper               %
                        % by the PC Member, if different; leave empty   %
                        % otherwise                                     %
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
\begin{Justification}   % Why do you rate the paper as above?           %
                        % An explanation is mandatory.                  %
                        %-----------------------------------------------%
The essence this paper is hard to capture, since it is based on a
stack or earlier papers (see the number of references in bot the
introduction and the text). The paper seems correct scientifically, but
it is hard to figure out the importance of the result.

Perhaps a paper better suited for a journal than for a conference.
\end{Justification}
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
\begin{Recommendation}  % Recommendation to the author(s) for           %
                        % possible improvements                         %
                        %-----------------------------------------------%
Page 2, {\it regular\/} is over-used specifically in TRS, choose
an other word.
\end{Recommendation}
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------%
\end{RefReport} %--------------------------------------------------------

\end{document}
