File #1: atoe-tcsJH.tex File #2: atoe-tcsJG.tex Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 1410:1411; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 1410:1411) 1410 It remains to note that [FD] and the other family axioms except [FFD] 1411 are satisfied too. Note that the DRS $\calR$ is stable. 1410 It remains to note that [FD] and the other family axioms but [FFD] 1411 are satisfied too. Note that the DRS $\calR$ is stable. Extra lines in 1st before 1969 in 2nd (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 1969:1971; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line Æ1969) 1969 \john{The phrase "exactly as the correctness of" above does not make sense. 1970 Please rephrase. (I don't know what you mean, so I cannot choose a better 1971 phrase).} Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2013; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2010) 2013 Note that if $P\staeq P'$, then $Pv$ is canonical iff so is $P'v$. So the 2010 Note that if $P\staeq P'$, then $Pv$ is canonical iff so is $P'v$. So Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2026; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2023) 2026 extraction procedure from $P'u'$. Now, if the last step, say $w$, of 2023 extraction procedure from $P'u'$. Now, if the last step, call it $w$, of Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2212; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2209) 2212 $P/Q$ coincides with $v$, i.e., $P/Q=v$. Thus $P$ contracts a redex $v''$ 2209 $P/Q$ coincides with $v$, i..e., $P/Q=v$. Thus $P$ contracts a redex $v''$ Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2379:2380; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2376:2378) 2379 2380 \section{Affine Zig-Zag and Separable Families} 2376 \john{Checked to here now.} 2377 2378 \section{Affine Zig-zag and Separable Families} Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2427:2428; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2425:2426) 2427 As already mentioned in the introduction, non-separable families (not using 2428 that name) for Interaction Systems are studied in~\cite{[AL]}, where it is 2425 As already mentioned in the introduction, non-separable families (without 2426 the name) are studied in~\cite{[AL]} for Interaction Systems, where it is Extra lines in 1st before 2440 in 2nd (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2442:2444; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line Æ2440) 2442 \john{Does linear need more motivation? It was introduced briefly earlier 2443 on but here we seem to say no nesting of redexes (which presumably implies 2444 linearity).} Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2448; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2443) 2448 $\lambda_{LV}$~\cite{[Plo75]}, which is obtained from the \lc\ by allowing 2443 $\lambda_{LV}$~\cite{[Plo75]}. It is obtained from the \lc\ by allowing Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2526; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2521) 2526 Let $Q^*:t\dored{P}s\red{u}e$ where $u$ creates $v\subt e$. Then, for any 2521 Let $Q^*:t\dored{P}s\red{u}e$ and $u$ create $v\subt e$. Then, for any Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2564; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2559) 2564 Let $Q:e\dored{P}t\red{u}s$ where $u$ creates $v\subt s$. Then 2559 Let $Q:e\dored{P}t\red{u}s$ and let $u$ create $v\subt s$. Then Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2622; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2617) 2622 Lemmas~\ref{L.dec.fam.ex.} and~\ref{L.dif.re.sa.his.} allow us to obtain 2617 Lemmas~\ref{L.dec.fam.ex.} and ~\ref{L.dif.re.sa.his.} allow us to obtain Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2861:2862; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2856:2857) 2861 \john{That section is very heavy! Maybe the reader needs to be warned.} 2862 2856 2857 Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2867; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2862) 2867 whose reduction steps correspond to complete family-reductions in $\calF$, 2862 whose reductions correspond to complete family-reductions in $\calF$, Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2875:2877; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2870:2871) 2875 \john{Do we call it L\'evy-implementation because he introduced the 2876 idea? If not, I would leave it out.} 2877 2870 2871 Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2886; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2880) 2886 each edge (i.e., reduction step) being a multi-step contracting a family 2880 each edge (i.e., a reduction step) being a multi-step contracting a family Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2941; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2935) 2941 viewed as reductions in $\calF$ (by considering multi-steps as 2935 viewed as reduction in $\calF$ (by considering multi-steps as Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 2978:2979; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 2972:2973) 2978 Qu$ iff $P'v'\fami Q'u'$, where $P'$ and $Q'$ are reductions in 2979 $\calR$ corresponding to $P$ and $Q$, and $v'$ and $u'$ are 2972 Qu$ iff $P'v'\fami Q'u'$, where $P'$ and $Q'$ are (any) reductions in 2973 $\calR$ corresponding to $P$ and $Q$, and $v'$ and $u'$ are any Extra lines in 2nd before 3046 in 1st (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line Æ3046; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 3040) 3040 \el Extra lines in 1st before 3069 in 2nd (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 3074; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line Æ3069) 3074 \el Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 3106:3109; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 3100:3102) 3106 which was used earlier by L\'evy in~\cite{[levy],[le80]}. It would be 3107 interesting to investigate whether it is possible to prove our second theorem 3108 in the context of stable DRS, without invoking family axioms, but possibly 3109 using some much 3100 which was used already by L\'evy in~\cite{[levy],[le80]}. It would be 3101 interesting to investigate whether it is possible to prove our second theorem 3102 already for stable DRSs, i.e., without family axioms, but possibly some much Nonmatching lines (File "atoe-tcsJH.tex"; Line 3121:3122; File "atoe-tcsJG.tex"; Line 3114:3115) 3121 two different members of the same family simultaneously. Finally, we have 3122 shown that sharing is compositional. In particular, any 3114 simultaneously two different members of the same family. Finally, we have 3115 shown that sharing is (de)compositional. In particular, any *** EOF on both files at the same time ***